top of page

web evaluation presentation

evaluation on: Aliza Khan
second subject: English Literature

Screenshot 2025-11-14 at 1.44.17 PM.png

Web Evaluation Feedback Notes

evaluation by: Frank Xu
second subject: Biology

Colour 4

  • Clear contrast

  • Colours in article pages can improve

    • More consistent

Images and Illustrations 4

  • Composition is mainly good

  • Fill gaps

  • No alt text

  • Make some less blurry (quality)

  • Add pop up

Icons and Graphics 4

  • Elements are not aligned

  • Should add description

  • No alt text (to provide context)

Layout and Composition 3

  • Fine grid elements

  • Lots of white space

    • Squish together to fill space

  • Lack of grid alignments

Typography 4

  • Title can be bigger/bolder

  • Good contrast between title and article

Text Alignment and Layout 4

  • Contrast can be improved

  • All left-aligned

    • Readable

  • Make size increase or bold

    • Have more contrast

Tone and Content Presentation 4

  • Writing is simple

  • Buttons work smoothly

  • Explain with simpler words to understand

Interaction between Text and Graphics 4

  • Good vision flow

  • Alignment problems

  • Well balanced

Title 5

  • Should be more bigger

  • Relevant to the article

​Introduction 5

  • Briefly summarizes context

  • Solid introduction

Definition and Shape 5

  • Frank didn’t say

 

Importance and Relevance 5

  • Very helpful for students

  • Interesting to read

 

Learning outcomes or Objectives 5

  • Helpful to students trying to learn about biology

  • Helps them in classes

 

Recent developments or Examples 5

  • Frank didn’t say

Conclusion 5

  • Not all articles have conclusions

  • Conclusion is solid in the two articles that have

    • Summaries the point

 

Style and Format 5

  • Simple and clear style

  • Easy for students to understand

  • Format needs clearer titles and better organization

web evaluation presentation

evaluation on: Kevin Jin
second subject: French

1.png

Web Evaluation Feedback Notes

evaluation by: Parma Tam
second subject: Biology

Colour 4

  • Clear contrast

  • Colours in article pages can improve

    • More consistent

Images and Illustrations 4

  • Composition is mainly good

  • Fill gaps

  • No alt text

  • Make some less blurry (quality)

  • Add pop up

Icons and Graphics 4

  • Elements are not aligned

  • Should add description

  • No alt text (to provide context)

Layout and Composition 3

  • Fine grid elements

  • Lots of white space

    • Squish together to fill space

  • Lack of grid alignments

Typography 4

  • Title can be bigger/bolder

  • Good contrast between title and article

Text Alignment and Layout 4

  • Contrast can be improved

  • All left-aligned

    • Readable

  • Make size increase or bold

    • Have more contrast

Tone and Content Presentation 4

  • Writing is simple

  • Buttons work smoothly

  • Explain with simpler words to understand

Interaction between Text and Graphics 4

  • Good vision flow

  • Alignment problems

  • Well balanced

Title 5

  • Should be more bigger

  • Relevant to the article

​Introduction 5

  • Briefly summarizes context

  • Solid introduction

Definition and Shape 5

  • Frank didn’t say

 

Importance and Relevance 5

  • Very helpful for students

  • Interesting to read

 

Learning outcomes or Objectives 5

  • Helpful to students trying to learn about biology

  • Helps them in classes

 

Recent developments or Examples 5

  • Frank didn’t say

Conclusion 5

  • Not all articles have conclusions

  • Conclusion is solid in the two articles that have

    • Summaries the point

 

Style and Format 5

  • Simple and clear style

  • Easy for students to understand

  • Format needs clearer titles and better organization

bottom of page